The Gap in Stories

Stories and the Gap

Stories and the gap

IN his influential book, Story, Robert McKee explains a mechanism that is central to understanding the protagonist’s action in stories. He calls this mechanism the gap.

The gap refers to the distance between the protagonist’s subjective evaluation of the achievability of the goal and its objective evaluation by the external world.

From the protagonist’s point of view the paths to the goal seem initially doable and efficient. But as he initiates action the reaction of the world creates a resistance which is proportional to the effort expended.

Extending the Gap in Stories

The more the effort the more resistance he encounters. The result is that his initial evaluation of the goal, too, begins to change. Inner and personal conflicts combine with external conflicts to open a gap between his action and its effectiveness.

This constant expansion of the gap changes the protagonist. He begins to doubt his ability to achieve success. He starts questioning his values and resources. He is forced to take more desperate action, take more risks, in order to try and reverse each failure.

Without a gap between expectation and result in stories, without increasing risk, there would be no tension and conflict. There would be no drama.

The gap between intention and result, therefore, is the space in which interesting and engrossing conflicts play themselves out. Additionally, the gap is not only the generator of inner and outer conflict, it is the motivator of change in the protagonist.


The gap in stories is the space that separates action and reaction, intention and result, emanating from the protagonist’s pursuit of the goal.

4 thoughts on “The Gap in Stories

  1. Gerhard Pistorius

    Great Post and very relevant. what is referred to as the “Gap” is like the perfect steping stone for what gets stories from script to screen. Film example: Dawn of the plannet of the Apes. Ceaser ( protagonist) wants to keep the peace between his Ape colony and the desperate humans , only to be betrayed by his most trusted Ape. By betraying his leader , the antagonist violates the one rule no Ape can brake. Ceaser’s reaction to this betrayal creates tension because his code of ” Ape no kill Ape” is put to the test.

    1. Stavros Halvatzis Post author

      Precisely, Gerhard. The gap between intention and result keeps widening until it is finally bridged to the end.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *