Effectively managing narrative perspective in story-telling is one of the most important and difficult skills to master. By perspective I mean the hierarchy of vantage points the writer adopts in relating the story to her audience or readers. There are three main levels of perspective: the author’s (she decides when, what and how much to reveal), the protagonist’s/characters’ (who act as if they have a life independent of the author’s), and the reader’s/audience’s (who interpret the story according to their own expectations). Most commonly, perspective is intimately tied to the protagonist’s point of view. Hence, in the absence of authorial or directorial declaration, what the protagonists sees and perceives to be truth is transmitted to the audience/reader as being true – until the revelation or point of schism. In the film The Matrix, for example, the audience is initially as unaware that the depicted world is an illusion as is Neo (Keano Reeves).
The Point of Schism
The plot thickens when our point of view separates from the protagonist’s. Before this moment, we share the protagonist’s confusion, bewilderment, and surprise as events unfold. Here, our association with the protagonist is one of subjectivity and identification. After the point of schism, we see beyond this limited vision – we perceive the dangers and are made privy to the traps planned for him by the antagonist. I call this moment the point of schism – or a tear in perspective – and regard it as a narrative device whose importance is comparable to that of a turning point or mid-point. The insight afforded us at this moment increases the suspense we feel for the protagonist, since we see danger approaching more clearly than he does. An example of this in The Matrix is the meeting between agent Smith, and Cypher (Joe Pantoliano) who offers to lead Neo and the others into a trap in exchange for being re-inserted back inside the matrix as “someone important”.
Reversing the Schism
Sometimes, however, the schism works in reverse order: the protagonist knows the truth while the audience doesn’t — in The Hunt for Red October, the audience believes that the defecting Russian submarine has been sunk by the Russian fleet, when in fact, it is a trick played on the Russians (and the audience) by Captain Marko Ramius (Sean Connery) in order to slip through the Russian net and seek asylum in the United States.
Occasionally, the story’s true perspective — the perspective of the author — is revealed to both the audience/reader and the protagonist simultaneously. Here, the author withholds crucial information from us and the protagonist till the revelation. In the film The Sixth Sense, Dr. Malcolm Crowe (Bruce Willis), a child psychologist, who is shot in the stomach by a disturbed patient at the beginning of the film, ostensibly attempts to help his young patient Cole Sear (Haley Joel Osment) to deal with problems arising from his ability to see dead people. His relationship with his wife continues to deteriorate as Crowe spends more and more time in his basement alone, and continues to treat Cole. The film, which is a master class in sleight-of-hand, reveals the biggest twist of all towards the end of the film when Crowe notices that his wedding ring in no longer on his finger but in his sleeping wife’s hand. We suddenly realize, along with Crowe, that it is he who has been dead all along as a result of having been shot in the stomach.
A Short Exercise
With reference to three films or novels you admire, answer the following questions:
Where is the point of schism in each?
Describe the type of schism.
What is the effect of the schism on the story and how could it have been done differently?
Choosing precisely when, where, and how to introduce a schism in perspective, and what form it will take, requires an understanding of how it will change your story and what effect it will have on your readers and audience. A skillful use of schism is an essential aspect of accomplished writing.